Artworks AI Platform: How RITHMS Boosts Cultural Heritage Security
- Marc Griffith

- Jan 1
- 4 min read

How the Platform Works
The platform operates in several stages. The first is data collection: using 50 data scrapers, i.e., software capable of extracting data from the web, open sources such as auction sites, galleries, news from specialized media, social media, and cultural heritage databases are queried. The next phase involves interpreting and organizing these data.
That’s where artificial intelligence comes into play, with Natural Language Processing algorithms that transform the texts gathered by the scrapers into an organized, coherent data system. These data are subsequently visualized in a knowledge graph capable of showing the relationships between objects, people, and entities. 'Here we apply social network analysis, i.e., analyzing the social networks we extract from the data collected', explains Arianna Travaglia, coordinator of the Center for Cultural Heritage Technologies (CCHT) at IIT in Venice.
That is, the same algorithms used to analyze connections on social networks are used. The difference is that in this context the connections concern suspicious interactions and investigative leads useful to operators to verify the provenance of an artifact, describing operations that aim to recreate legitimate provenance or to facilitate the money laundering tied to art trafficking.
Work of Law Enforcement
It’s important to specify that RITHMS does not identify culprits to arrest. No judge would deem a proof generated by artificial intelligence as valid to bring to court, Travaglia emphasizes. We generate intelligence operations that are then investigated traditionally.
The platform has managed to generate a knowledge graph with over 2 million entities, second only to the Carabinieri’s database for the Protection of Cultural Heritage, which contains the cataloguing of nearly 7 million artworks, of which about 1.3 million are reported as stolen. Additionally, it was noted that the EU funded the platform with 5 million euros, testifying to public interest in strengthening intelligence tools for cross-border protection of cultural heritage.
Implications for Innovators and Startups
This kind of solution isn’t limited to the world of culture. The combined approach of data scraping, NLP, and knowledge graphs offers a framework applicable to similar contexts where it’s necessary to correlate large volumes of heterogeneous data, identify patterns, and generate reliable insights for rapid operational decisions. For a startup, it confirms the value of investing in modular technology kits: automated data collection, semantic analysis, and tools for visualizing relationships among actors, assets, and contexts.
Debate: Pros and Cons, Opportunities and Risks
The RITHMS platform represents a strong trend in cultural heritage security and data governance. On one hand, investing in AI to identify trafficking networks, unclear provenance, and art laundering offers a powerful lever to accelerate investigations and reduce intervention times. The use of 50 data scrapers provides broad, systemic coverage of online sources, becoming a useful resource for reconstructing provenance chains and tracing transactions involving potentially stolen artworks. The knowledge graph with over 2 million entities demonstrates the scalability of this approach and its potential value in other fields where traceability and provenance are central, such as the trade in high-value goods or critical supply chains. The European Union’s financial support, amounting to 5 million euros, signals a clear public endorsement: technological innovation can serve as a security infrastructure.
But there are also risks and limits that deserve attention. First, the reliability of AI models depends on data quality: if sources contain errors or biases, knowledge graphs can generate misleading correlations with potential legal consequences. The use of open data implies a discussion on privacy, accountability, and governance: the networks analyzed could include people or entities not involved in illicit activity, with risks of false positives. Moreover, the actual effectiveness of such a platform depends on good integration between technology and traditional investigation: AI does not replace human analysis but enhances it. This implies a business model that includes training, data standards, and verification processes shared among public authorities, law enforcement, and the private sector.
A different perspective is to think of similar solutions not only for cultural heritage but as templates for sectors where traceability is critical: broad adoption of metadata, interoperability between databases, and AI tools that expand the ability to correlate signals from diverse sources. Looking at the global ecosystem, opportunities for startups are twofold: building AI-based security platforms for related sectors and providing consulting services on data governance, ethics, and regulatory compliance. On the other hand, there is a need to mature the regulatory framework for the responsibility of AI intelligence solutions, clearly defining limits, rights, and governance mechanisms.
Conclusion: Technology and Governance for the Next Step in Innovation
The artwork AI platform represents a meaningful example of how AI can become a tangible lever for security and traceability in the art world. For founders and innovators, the message is clear: integrating technological sophistication, reliable data, and robust governance can open new industrial opportunities, while requiring responsible handling of ethical and legal implications. If we want to translate these potentials into sustainable growth, it is crucial to develop standards, public-private collaborations, and validation pathways that ensure reliability, transparency, and interoperability among diverse actors.




